Innocent III, original name
(born 1160/61, Gavignano Castle,
di Roma, Papal States [now in Italy]—died July 16, 1216, Perugia), the most significant pope of the
Middle Ages. Elected pope on January 8, 1198, Innocent III reformed the Roman Curia, reestablished and expanded the pope’s authority over the
Papal States, worked tirelessly to launch
Crusades to recover the Holy Land, combated
Italy and southern France, shaped a powerful and original doctrine of papal power within the church and in secular affairs, and in 1215 presided over the fourth
Lateran Council, which reformed many clerical and lay practices within the church.
Early life and career
The son of
Trasimund, count of
Scotti, the daughter of a noble Roman family,
Lothar began his education in Rome, possibly at the
Cantorum. After his early education in Rome, he traveled north in the late 1170s or 1180 to study in Paris, the leading centre of theological studies. Although little is known about his stay in Paris, what is known is suggestive. His teachers, Peter of
Corbeil and Peter the Chanter, were the most accomplished theologians in Europe.
Stephen Langton, whom
Lothar as Pope Innocent later appointed archbishop of Canterbury, and Robert of
Courson, whom he appointed as a papal legate and later raised to the
cardinalate, were among his fellow students. In Paris
Lothar learned to use the Bible as a tool for understanding and solving problems. His theological training shaped his thought and his language for the rest of his life and provided a foundation for his outlook and his policies.
Lothar studied in Bologna, whose university was the preeminent one for the study of canon and civil law. Although he may have pursued law for more than two or three years (the chronology of his life at this time is uncertain), it did not become the discipline that shaped his worldview or his vision of the
papacy. During the 1190s
Lothar wrote three theological tracts:
condicionis humane (On the Misery of the Human Condition),
mysteriis (On the Mysteries of the Mass), and
nuptiarum (On Four Types of Marriage). The first was enormously popular in the Middle Ages, and the others demonstrate that he was a competent, if not gifted, theologian. All three tracts demonstrate his ability to use the Bible to understand Christian institutions in creative and original ways. They also reveal that his experience in Paris shaped his worldview more than his stay in Bologna.
Lothar probably entered clerical orders in Rome while he was a young boy. After his studies in Paris,
Lothar was made a
subdeacon by Pope
Gregory VIII in late 1187. Pope
Clement III elevated him to the office of
cardinal deacon of SS.
Sergius and Bacchus in December 1189 or January 1190. He worked in the papal curia during the 1190s but neither received important commissions nor held significant positions. In spite of his youth and lack of administrative experience, the cardinals quickly elected
Lothar pope on the same day that the aged pope
Celestine III died (January 8, 1198). He was given or took the name Innocent III, was ordained a priest on February 21, 1198, and was consecrated as
bishop of Rome the next day, on the feast day of St. Peter’s Chair. Innocent undoubtedly chose the day of his consecration carefully. He wrote many sermons after he became pope, several of which commemorated the feast day of his consecration. When Innocent reflected on the first pope and Peter’s legacy in these sermons, he presented a luminous vision of the papal office and the pope’s role in Christendom.
At the beginning of his pontificate, Innocent faced several serious problems. Emperor
Henry VI had died, and there were two candidates for the
imperial throne: Henry’s brother,
Philip of Swabia, and
Otto of Brunswick. The German princes were divided over the succession, southern Italy was in political shambles, and the Christian states in the Holy Land were in the hands of the Muslims. In the second half of the 12th century, heresy had become a grave problem in southern France. Papal authority in the city of Rome and over the Papal States had disintegrated, and the papal curia needed reform. Innocent faced all these problems simultaneously.
The new pope’s
vigour and resolve can be seen in the letters of the papal registers and in a chronicle,
Innocentii III (“The Deeds of Innocent III”), written about 1208 by an anonymous member of Innocent’s curia who apparently knew the pope very well. In one of his first letters, Innocent ordered King
Philip Augustus of France to take back his wife, whom the king had abandoned. With this mandate Innocent signaled his intention to extend papal jurisdiction and authority into the marital affairs of Christian princes.
From the beginning of his pontificate, Innocent also sought to establish papal temporal authority over Rome and the
Papal States. Immediately after his consecration, he received homage from the leaders of the Roman nobility. In order to dominate the city of Rome, Innocent ordered the construction of the Torre
dei’Conti, a massive military fortification in the middle of the city, which he placed under the command of his brother Richard. Earlier popes had confined their claims of sovereignty over the Papal States (Patrimony of St. Peter) to the area immediately around Rome, but Innocent used the power vacuum created by the death of the emperor to make much more expansive claims. He systematically sent papal legates to the cities of central Italy to secure their loyalty. Within a remarkably short time, not only nearby cities but also some as far away as
Ancona, Assisi, Perugia, and Spoleto had declared their allegiance to the pope. By October 30, 1198, Innocent sent a letter to the rectors of those cities that had submitted to papal lordship. In it he fashioned a striking image of papal authority that he would repeat throughout his pontificate. Papal authority was represented by the Sun, and the Moon signified the power of lay princes. Both powers were established by God, he explained, but, just as the Moon received its
splendour from the Sun, royal power acquired its greatness and dignity from papal authority.
Innocent’s creative and passionate rhetoric became a part of his ruling style, and his deeds matched his rhetoric. He established a much larger papal territory than any of his predecessors had controlled, and, from his pontificate on, the pope functioned as an important secular prince in central Italy. Innocent understood the dangers of a pope exercising secular power, however. In the
Gesta, his biographer commented that the more Innocent wished to free himself from secular affairs, the greater they burdened him. Innocent, he wrote, had often remarked, “Who touches tar is dirtied by it” (Ecclesiasticus 13:1).
Innocent was consumed by a passion to
Jerusalem and the Holy Land, which had been lost following the
Ḥaṭṭīn in 1187. On August 15, 1198, he sent letters to the kings and bishops of Christendom, imploring them to take up the cross and launch a new
Crusade. He promised Crusaders a new papal
indulgence, took them under papal protection, and imposed a tax on the clergy to help pay for the expedition. In spite of Innocent’s best efforts, the
Fourth Crusade (1202–04) lacked strong leadership and was chronically short of money. The Venetians built a fleet to transport a large army, but the French and German contingents were only one-third of their projected size and could not fulfill their contractual obligations to pay the Venetians for transport. The result was a disaster for the papacy and for the
Byzantine Empire. The Venetians persuaded the army to divert the Crusade to Constantinople because they wanted to depose one emperor and replace him with another. Outraged, Innocent excommunicated the Venetians, but he could not thwart their plans. The fleet arrived in Constantinople, and after a siege the city fell into Latin hands (April 12, 1204). Innocent accepted the result, mistakenly believing that the conquest of Constantinople would reunite the Latin and Greek churches. Instead, the
Latins ruled over a truncated empire until 1261 and irrevocably weakened it. After the Greeks regained control of the Byzantine Empire and church, they rejected papal authority, and the two churches have remained divided.
Innocent’s first year was also marked by his efforts to establish his vision of papal monarchical power and authority within the church. Combining a streak of hardheaded practicality with an intellectual’s interest in ideas, Innocent transformed the theory of papal monarchy and pushed the papacy in new directions. His most creative rhetorical statements on papal power were expressed in letters that expanded the authority of the pope over emperor, kings, princes, and bishops. He claimed that the pope “has the authority because he does not exercise the office of man, but of the true God on earth.” Moreover, he implemented this vision in a number of ways. The author of the
Gesta painted a portrait of a pope who had great skill in judicial affairs and who participated personally in some of the legal cases that the papal court accepted on appeal. By reforming the papal curia and reorganizing the papal judicial system, Innocent strengthened the hierarchical structure of the church. He also mandated the subordination of the bishops to the pope and insisted that only the pope could approve
episcopal translations, resignations, and depositions. At the same time, Innocent swept away almost all the older, decentralized institutions that were characteristic of the church in the early Middle Ages.
When Innocent was elevated to the papacy, the political situation in Italy and Germany was precarious because of
Philip of Swabia’s and
Otto of Brunswick’s competing claims for the imperial throne. The struggle for the succession to the throne would be the most difficult problem Innocent faced in his first years as pope and would be complicated further by imperial and papal relations with southern Italy and
Sicily. By the time of his death in 1197, Emperor
Henry VI had subjected almost the entire Italian peninsula, including most of the Papal States, and Sicily to his rule. Henry’s claim to the south—the Norman kingdom of Sicily, a papal fief subject to the authority of the pope—was strengthened by his marriage to Constance, the daughter of King
Roger II of Sicily. The legitimate heir to the kingdom of Sicily was Henry’s three-year old son, the future emperor
Frederick II. Constance promoted Frederick’s interests by putting him under the protection of Innocent, who thus became regent. The pope’s challenge was to mediate the imperial succession while preserving the rights of Frederick and, especially, maintaining the integrity of the Papal States and papal power.
Faced with these challenges, Innocent moved quickly and effectively to recover the Papal States and also attempted to exercise his rights as feudal overlord of the kingdom of Sicily. In his dealings with the claimants to the imperial throne, Innocent sought to separate Sicily from the empire because any ruler who possessed both crowns was a threat to the Papal States. He exacted promises from both Otto and Philip to respect the boundaries of papal territory, but both candidates betrayed his trust. The importance and seriousness of the problem can be seen in the
Gesta, which devotes many pages to the dispute, and in the special papal register that Innocent’s curia maintained for preserving a record of it (Super
imperii; “Concerning the Business of the Roman Empire”). Fearing the ambitions of the
Hohenstaufen Philip, Innocent supported Otto until the murder of Philip in 1208, at which point Otto violated his agreements with the pope. In 1212 Innocent was forced to turn to Henry’s son, Frederick, whose rule the pope had hoped to limit to the Sicilian kingdom. Although forced to support a candidate against his better judgment, Innocent used the dispute to establish the pope’s right to evaluate imperial candidates in a contested election.
venerabilem (“Through Our Venerable Brother”), the
letter he wrote in 1202 reserving this right, quickly became part of
canon law, even though Innocent’s claim was without precedent.
At the beginning of his second year as pope, Innocent turned his attention to the problem of heresy within the borders of Christendom. In a
senium (March 25, 1199), that he sent to
Viterbo, a city within the Papal States, Innocent declared that heresy was treason against God. Consequently, in pursuing heretics, he applied the sanctions and employed the procedural norms used in ancient Roman treason trials. This began Innocent’s long campaign to eradicate heresy, which lasted until the end of his pontificate and culminated in the
Cathar (Albigensian) heretics had become prevalent in southern France. As early as 1199 the pope sent legates to deal with these heretics and their supporters, and in 1206
St. Dominic began to preach to the heretics with Innocent’s support. These efforts produced few results. Finally, in 1208, following the assassination of the papal legate, Innocent launched a Crusade against the heretics and gave the participants full Crusader indulgences and privileges. The war lasted until after Innocent’s death. Even after a political settlement brought the fighting to an end, the
Cathar heresy flourished in the region until the beginning of the 14th century. Innocent’s Crusade was significant, despite the survival of
Catharism, because with it the pope began the practice of using the Crusade to combat papal enemies wherever they were found. Later popes called for
Crusades against disobedient Christian rulers and even cardinals of the church.
At the same time he was supporting St. Dominic, Innocent permitted
St. Francis of Assisi to continue recruiting brothers and gave limited approval to the
Franciscan religious life in 1210.
A conflict between King
Philip II Augustus of France and King
John of England occupied the middle years of Innocent’s pontificate.
John was a mediocre king whose weaknesses were skillfully exploited by Philip. At the beginning of Innocent’s pontificate, John still held extensive lands in France for which he owed fealty and homage to Philip. In 1202 Philip declared John guilty of improper
behaviour in his adjudication of a marriage case and stripped him of his French fiefs. The result was a war that lasted four years. Philip’s armies had great success, and John appealed to Innocent for justice. The pope responded in a
ille (“He Knows”), in which he refused to condemn Philip but stated that he could intervene in secular matters by
peccati (“reason of sin”).
ille became a part of canon law and justified papal and ecclesiastical interference in secular affairs for centuries.
John’s and Innocent’s paths continued to cross for the rest of their lives. John became embroiled in a dispute with the monks of Christ Church, Canterbury, who had the authority to elect the archbishop of Canterbury, the primate of England. When John tried to force his candidate upon the monks, they appealed to Rome, and Innocent bypassed both candidates to appoint a famous theologian,
Stephen Langton, as archbishop. (Taking away the right of election from local churches became more and more common after Innocent’s pontificate.) John refused to accept Stephen, and Innocent finally excommunicated the king for his obstinacy in 1209. However, a settlement was concluded between Innocent and John in 1213. In return for Innocent’s support, John subjected his kingdom to the pope and swore homage and fealty to him. Like Sicily, England became a papal fief, an arrangement that probably reflected Innocent’s ideal for the proper governance of Christendom. When the barons of England later forced John to sign
Carta, Innocent declared the charter null and void because it violated his rights as feudal lord.
Crusading continued to occupy Innocent in his later years. In a letter in 1213, he called for a new Crusade, and he also announced a new council to be held in Rome in 1215. The fourth
Lateran Council provided a capstone for his pontificate. In November 1215, 412 bishops obeyed the pope’s summons and gathered in Rome at the Church of St. John Lateran. The council issued 72 canons, which dealt with heresy and the new Crusade, imposed new restrictions on the Jews, and legislated other matters of belief and practice. Notably, Canon 8 provided the preliminary foundations of new procedural rules that later popes would use to try heretics in ecclesiastical courts. Innocent did not found the
Inquisition, but Canon 8 established some norms used in the inquisitorial courts. Canon 18 forbade the participation of clerics in the ceremony of the
ordeal. This canon eventually rendered the Germanic modes of proof—ordeal by water, fire, and oaths—ineffective in Christian
society. If they had not already done so, secular courts quickly adopted the procedures of the ecclesiastical court system (except in England). Innocent also paid attention to the spiritual affairs of his flock. Canon 21 dictated that all Christians should confess their sins and receive Holy Communion once a year. Canon 50 changed the limits of consanguinity and affinity for marriage from seven to four degrees. The council promulgated other canons that regulated the lives of the clergy and the administration of churches.
The fourth Lateran Council was the most important one of the medieval period and a fitting end to Innocent’s pontificate. The pope died in Perugia less than a year after the council ended. His new Crusade had not been launched, the church was still struggling with heresy, and the young emperor-elect,
Frederick II, was a growing concern. But Innocent left a rich legacy. He had a talent for balancing power and spiritual solicitude. His pontificate changed the papacy forever and provided future popes with a conception of papal authority that still inheres in the papal office today. A medieval chronicler,
Vitry, has left us a vivid account of Innocent’s death. He saw Innocent’s body in Perugia as it lay almost naked on his tomb. The body smelled, and looters had plundered the rich garments in which the pope was to be buried.
Brevis sit et
gloria (“Brief and empty is the deceptive glory of this world”), reflected the chronicler, unaware that he was contemplating the fate of the greatest of all medieval popes.
Innocent’s writings are collected in a number of important editions and translations.
Completus, 221 vol. (1844–64), includes his correspondence (vol. 214–217), the
Innocentii III (vol. 214), and his theological works (vol. 217). Modern, annotated editions of Innocent’s letters are available in
Hageneder et al. (eds.),
Innocenz’ III (1964– ). The record of the dispute between Otto of Brunswick and Philip of Swabia is in
Imperii (1947), vol. 12 of
Pontificiae. Another important German work is
Innocenz III (1954), vol. 19 of
Pontificiae. Translations of
contemptu mundi, also known as
condicionis humane, include
Robert E. Lewis (ed.),
condicionis humane (1978), in English and Latin; and
Donald R. Howard (ed.),
On the Misery of the Human Condition (1969; originally published in Latin, 1955). An account of the proceedings of the fourth Lateran Council can be found in
Decretals, and Collections of Canon Law: Selected Essays, 2nd ed. (1992); also useful is
Karl F. Morrison (eds.),
Medieval Europe (1986).
The best general biographies of Innocent are
Innocent III: Leader of Europe, 1198–1216 (1994); and
Pope Innocent III (1980; originally published in German, 1954). An excellent synthesis on Innocent’s early life is
Edward Peters, “Lotario
Segni Becomes Pope Innocent III: The Man and the Pope,” in
John C. Moore (ed.),
Pope Innocent III and His World (1999), pp. 3–24; there are other valuable essays in this volume. Further information on his early career is in
Popes, Canonists, and Texts: 1150–1550 (1993), which also discusses Innocent’s ideas of the papacy. Another important study is
Innocenzo III (1972).
Innocent’s relationship with England is discussed in
C.R. Cheney and
Selected Letters of Pope Innocent III Concerning England (1198–1216) (1953);
C.R. Cheney and
Mary G. Cheney (eds.),
The Letters of Pope Innocent III (1198–1216) Concerning England and Wales: A Calendar with an Appendix of Texts (1967); and
Pope Innocent III and England (1976).
Innocent’s political, doctrinal, and sacerdotal ideas have also been the subject of much study. The pastoral side of his character is addressed in
Innocent III: Studies on Papal Authority and Pastoral Care (1995). Innocent’s theology is examined by
Innocenz’ III. (1198–1216) (1983).
Pope and Bishops: The Papal Monarchy in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries (1984), discusses Innocent’s vision of the papal office. The only known letter of Cardinal
Lothar is examined in
Maleczek, “Ein Brief des
Lothar von SS.
Sergius und Bacchus (Innocenz III.) an Kaiser Heinrich VI.,”
Mittelalters, vol. 38, pp. 564–576 (1982). Good introductions to Innocent’s views on church and state include
Kenneth Pennington, “Pope Innocent
III’s Views on Church and State: A Gloss to
Kenneth Pennington and
Robert Somerville (eds.),
Law, Church, and Society: Essays in Honor of Stephan
Kuttner (1977), pp. 49–67; and
Brian Tierney, “Tria
Iudicia…, A Note on Innocent
Speculum, 37(1):48–59 (January 1962).