Vatican Archives Register 6, fol. 72r (Innocent
III's Sixth Pontifical Year) |
Fourth
Lateran Council c.8 [4
Comp. 5.1.4(X 5.1.24)]
Sources of Canon 8
Proporationality, Types of Procedure,
Secundum ordinem iudiciarii |
Ad corrigendos itaque
subditorum excessus tanto diligentius debet praelatus assurgere, quanto
damnabilius eorum offensas desereret incorrectas. Contra quos, ut de
notoriis excessibus taceatur, etsi tribus modis possit procedi, per
accusationem videlicet, denunciationem et inquisitionem ipsorum: ut tamen
in omnibus diligens adhibeatur cautela, ne forte per leve compendium ad
grave dispendium veniatur sicut accusationem legitima debet praecedere
inscriptio, sic et denunciationem caritativa monitio, et inquisitionem
clamosa insinuatio praevenire, illo semper adhibito moderamine, ut iuxta
formam iudicii sententiae quoque forma dictetur. Hunc tamen ordinem circa
regulares personas non credimus usquequaque servandum, quae, cum causa
requirit, facilius et liberius a suis possunt administrationibus amoveri.
|
A prelate should
act more diligently in correcting the offenses of his subjects in
proportion as he would be worthy of condemnation were he to leave them
uncorrected. Notorious cases aside,
he may proceed against them in three ways: namely by accusation,
denunciation, and investigation. Let
him take care, nevertheless, to handle all cases justly so that serious
loss is not made for the sake of a small gain. Consequently a admonition
should precede an accusation, a caring warning should precede a
denunciation, and public publication of the charges should precede
an investigation. The rule should
always be adhered to that the judgment shall conform to the rules of
judicial procedure. We do not think,
however, that canons regular fall under these rules since they can be
removed by their superiors when there is cause to do so.
Translation based on Norman P. Tanner, Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils
(Washington,
D.C. 1990) 1.237-239 |